"And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off [Jesus went to the cross], but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
    "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week [beginning of the Tribulation & the Rapture]: and in the midst of the week [3.5 years into the Tribulation] he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease [the sacrifices in the third rebuilt Israeli Temple], and for the overspreading of abominations [the Antichrist is given full power, God withdraws] he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate." (Daniel 9:26, 27)
 
 Continuous Reporting From Israel
Under the Obama Administration
It confirms that the Bible is true!

Reported by retired pastor/teacher James McCutchan

 
 


Aug 1, 2010 9:01 AM
Obama warns Abbas against failure to resume direct talks

RAMALLAH, Palestinian Territories (AFP) – US President Barack Obama has warned Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas that failure to resume direct peace talks with Israel could undermine US-Palestinian ties, Palestinian officials said on Saturday.

Obama made the warning in a letter to Abbas but also pledged to rally Arab, European and Russian support for the Palestinians if direct negotiations resume, a Palestinian official told AFP speaking on condition of anonymity.

"In the letter, President Barack Obama warned president Mahmud Abbas that his refusal to enter into direct negotiations with Israel next month will have consequences for American-Palestinian relations," the official said.
The 16-point letter had a "carrot-and-stick approach," he added.

Obama stressed "it is high time to resume direct negotiations with Israel" and told Abbas that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "is ready to resume direct negotiations."

The letter warned that "Obama will absolutely not accept the rejection of his recommendation to move to direct negotiations and that there will be consequences for such a rejection in the form of a lack of trust in president Abbas and the Palestinian side," the official said.

Obama pledged that his administration would work to extend a partial Israeli moratorium on Jewish settlements due to expire in September if Abbas resumes direct negotiations, he added.

"But in case of a refusal its assistance on that issue will be very limited," he said, quoting from the letter in Arabic.
Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat confirmed to AFP that Abbas received a letter from the US president on July 16.

"The president received on July 16 a letter from Obama in which he calls on the Palestinians to enter into direct negotiations and that these negotiations will lead to the creation of an independent Palestinian state," Erakat said.

In the letter Obama "assured Abbas that the US administration will strive to put an end to (Jewish) settlements if direct peace talks go underway but that its role would be less if this does not happen," Erakat said.

The revelation comes after the Arab League agreed in principle on Thursday to the resumption of direct Palestinian-Israeli peace talks, stressing however that Abbas had the final word on when they should start.

The Palestinian official who declined to be named said Obama expects direct peace talks to begin at the onset of August and to address thorny issues such as borders and Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem.

Abbas, who is holding US-brokered indirect talks with Israel, has conditioned going into face-to-face talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on a raft of demands rejected by Israel.

He wants a complete end to settlement construction in east Jerusalem and the West Bank, which Israel occupied in 1967, and has said negotiations on a Palestinian state´s borders must be based on the pre-1967 borders.

He has threatened to turn to the UN Security Council if there is no progress on his demands by September, when the four-month indirect talks with Israel are due to end. (Copyright © 2010 Agence France Presse. 07/31/10)
MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

----------oOo---------
 
 
"Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: (Titus 2:13).

"And he
(the beast) shall confirm (guarantee) the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)" [Daniel 9:27].

US: Direct talks to resume Sept. 2
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
08/20/2010

WASHINGTON — Israel and the Palestinians have agreed to resume direct negotiations in Washington early next month, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Friday, with a goal of two sovereign states existing side by side in peace.
Clinton made the announcement at the State Department with special Mideast peace envoy George Mitchell at her side.
"As we move forward, it is important that actions by all sides help to advance our effort, not hinder it," Clinton said. "There have been difficulties in the past; there will be difficulties ahead. Without a doubt, we will hit more obstacles. The enemies of peace will keep trying to defeat us and to derail these talks. But I ask the parties to persevere."
The office of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu issued a statement Friday welcoming the US plan.
"Reaching an agreement is a difficult challenge but is possible," the Netanyahu statement said. "We are coming to the talks with a genuine desire to reach a peace agreement between the two peoples that will protect Israel's national security interests, foremost of which is security."
Clinton said the face-to-face talks are to begin September 2 and she hoped that a comprehensive peace agreement can be reached within one year.
"We believe it can be done within a year and that is our objective," Mitchell told reporters. The US, he said, will offer "bridging proposals" designed to advance the negotiations, but he was not specific.
Mitchell said subsequent negotiating sessions with Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas probably will be held in the Mideast, but he mentioned no specific site.
Also invited to attend the Washington session are Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Jordan's King Abdullah II, "in view of their critical role in this effort," Clinton said.
US President Barack Obama will hold one-on-one talks with each of the four leaders, separately, on September 1, followed by a dinner with them, Clinton said.
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the special representative of the "Quartet" of Mideast peacemakers — the US, the UN, the European Union and Russia — also has been invited to attend the dinner, she said.
Clinton said she would then host the first direct Israel-Palestinian negotiating session on September 2.

JESUS SAID, "WATCH AND KNOW THE HOUR"
"If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee"
(Revelation 3:3).
 
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).

----------oOo---------
 
UPDATE:
Sep 2, 2010 4:41 PM
As Middle East peace talks open, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says these negotiations are the key to freeing Israelis, Palestinians from "shackles of history."
But she said the United States "cannot and will not impose a solution" to the conflict.
In his remarks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel is prepared "to go a long way in a short time" for peace. He said Israel is prepared to make "painful sacrifices," but that a final agreement must be built on "legitimacy and security."
He tells Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas that "I'm fully aware and respect your people's desire for sovereignty." In return, Netanyahu says, Israel expects Palestinians to "recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people."
 
Update at 10:49 a.m. ET: Abbas says "what's encouraging ... is that the road is clear in front of us."
 
Update at 10:51 a.m. ET: Abbas calls on Israel to end all construction of settlements and to lift the embargo on Gaza. He says the PLO is taking part in the talks "with good intentions" and looks to start "a new era" in relations between Israel and the Palestinians.
 
Update at 1:17 p.m. ET: Netanyahu and Abbas held private, one-of-one meeting at the end of the first round of direct negotiations, Special U.S. envoy George Mitchell told reporters. He said talks began with a meeting of full delegations from the United States, Israel and the Palestinians, moved on to a smaller meeting between Netanyahu, Abbas, Mitchell and Clinton in the secretary of State's office before the Israeli and Palestinian leaders went off for one-on-one talks.
Mitchell described the mood as "cordial and positive" between the two leaders.
He said the second round of direct talks will be held Sept.14-15 in the region and will be held every two weeks after that.
Mitchell told reporters that the Israeli and Palestinian leaders expressed their intent to approach the negotiations "in good faith and with seriousness of purpose." He said they also agreed that the ongoing talks "must be kept private and treated with utmost sensitivity."
 
(Posted by Doug Stanglin)

----------oOo---------
 
 

"And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it" (Zechariah 12:3).
Dividing the Jews´ Eternal Capital (New York Post OP-ED by Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi 09/02/10)

By coming to peace talks ready to discuss any issue including Jerusalem, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has followed in the footsteps of other Israeli prime ministers in showing he is serious about making peace with the Palestinians.

In a country deeply divided between religious and secular people, no issue unites Israelis (and Jews around the world) like the need to retain Jerusalem as their united, eternal and undivided capital. It is a belief built on 3,000 years of history -- and reinforced by bitter recent experience. Yet, in pursuit of peace, Defense Minister Ehud Barak yesterday outlined an extensive plan for how Jerusalem might be divided, as part of a comprehensive Palestinian-Israeli accord.

Jerusalem was King David´s capital, the site of the First and Second Temples. Its surviving remnant, the Western Wall, remains the focus of daily prayer.

Even during long centuries of exile, a Jewish community held on in Jerusalem, sometimes under great persecution.

Yet, from 1948 to 1967 when Jordan controlled East Jerusalem, the city was divided by barbed wire and concrete barriers. Jews were barred from their holy places. The Jordanians destroyed 58 synagogues and desecrated an ancient Jewish cemetery.

Christians, who also cherish Jerusalem, faced restrictions such as strict limits on visitors, even at Christmas and Easter.
In contrast, Israel has always guaranteed free and safe access to people of all faiths.

Despite all this, Barak, then prime minister, offered wide-ranging concessions at Camp David in 2000. Recognizing that Palestinians wished to make part of the city, which they call Al Quds, capital of a new Palestinian state, he proposed to withdraw from some Arab neighborhoods and grant autonomy to others. The Palestinians would maintain control over their holy places and have "religious sovereignty" over the Temple Mount -- if they were willing to agree to a comprehensive peace accord that recognized Israel´s right to exist as a Jewish state.
Barak´s offer included many other concessions of territory, if none as symbolically powerful as Jerusalem. Yet the Palestinian leader, the late Yasser Arafat, rejected the deal.
And quickly following the collapse of the Camp David talks was the Second Intifada (uprising) -- during which Palestinian suicide bombers time and again intentionally slaughtered civilians. In all, more than 1,000 Israelis were killed in those terrible years.
Despite two terror attacks in two days this week, Israel stands ready to make peace.
Once again, an Israeli leader is willing to go anywhere, anytime, and discuss anything -- including Jerusalem. When will Palestinians say yes to peace?

Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi is the founder & president of The Israel Project, a nonprofit providing factual information about Israel and the Middle East to media, policy makers and the public.(Copyright 2010 NYP Holdings, Inc. 09/02/10)

MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

Many prophecy students know Israel's soon-coming "covenant with many" will never be implemented. Why not? The Bible says:

"For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape"
(I Thessalonians 5:3).

"And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it" (Isaiah 28:18).

"And when ye shall Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh" (Luke 21:20).

"And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled"
(Luke 21:24).


Also, most prophecy students also know Israel will build a temple and worship therein during the first half of the seven-year tribulation very shortly after the "covenant with many" is confirmed by the beast (king of the West). [Daniel 9:27].
It is inconceivable that the Arabs would ever agree to Israel's building a temple in old Jerusalem, which is, they say, their holy place. The militant Muslims won't even recognize Israel's right to exist as a political state in "their holy land." Something very dramatic will happen very shortly after the
"covenant's" confirmation ceremony on the first day of the tribulation. Something so dramatic that it will void the "covenant" and allow for Israel to immediately build a temple.
 
"Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: (Titus 2:13).
 
 
----------oOo---------
 
 
"Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: (Titus 2:13).

"And he
(the beast) shall confirm (guarantee) the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)" [Daniel 9:27].

Israeli PM Netanyahu seeks 'new solutions' to Palestinian conflict

From: NewsCore
September 06, 2010

ISRAELI Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said today that creative thinking was needed to end the decades-old Palestinian conflict.

"We will need to think creatively, and in new ways, about how to resolve complex problems," he told reporters at the start of Israel's weekly cabinet meeting.
"In order to reach practical solutions, we will need to think about new solutions to old problems," the right-wing leader said, without unveiling specific proposals.
The prime minister insisted that he was "willing to achieve an historic compromise with our Palestinian neighbours so long as it maintains the national interests of the state of Israel with security first and foremost."
The two sides relaunched direct peace talks at a Washington summit on Thursday after a 20-month hiatus, but the negotiations will face a major test later this month when an Israeli settlement moratorium expires.
Palestinians have threatened that the peace process will come to an end if Israel does not renew the partial freeze on settlement construction in the occupied West Bank when it expires on September 26.
Netanyahu, under pressure from right-wingers to resume construction, has said settlements should be discussed alongside other core disputes that have bedeviled past attempts at peace, including the final status of Jerusalem and the fate of Palestinian refugees.
Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas and Netanyahu plan to hold twice-monthly talks starting with a September 14-15 meeting in Egypt's Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, which US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is due to attend.
"We hope to bring [about] a Palestinian state. If we fail to bring it now, then I think we'll go home," Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat said.
He added that such a scenario would cause the moderate Palestinian leadership to disintegrate, leaving Islamist Hamas - sworn to the Jewish state's destruction - at the head of the national movement.
"If we have an agreement, [Hamas] will disappear, and if we don't have an agreement, then we will disappear," Erakat warned. "I really hope that we can make it, God willing."
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Review: The first day of the seven-year tribulation is marked by a confirmation ceremony with much pomp and ceremony celebrating Israel's "peace" covenant. The Church will be caught up (raptured) immediately prior to the confirmation ceremony as the Church Age does not enter the seven-year tribulation.
 
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).
 
----------oOo---------
 
“Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and ye perish from the way” (Psalm 2:12).
 
What the Bible Says, by Pastor Ed Rice
 
There is no chapter more graphic nor vivid in portraying a nations sin than Ezekiel 16. Although God aimed at Judah, He sure hits America squarely in her heart. Elsewhere God also said:
 
“Son of man, these men have set up their idols in their heart, and put the stumblingblock of their iniquity before their face. Should I be inquired of at all by them?” (Ezekiel 14:3) “They shall bear the punishment of their iniquity: the punishment of the prophet shall be even as the punishment of him that seeketh unto him;” (Ezekiel 14:10) “When the land sinneth against me by trespassing grievously, then will I stretch out mine hand upon it, and will break the staff of the bread thereof, and will send famine upon it” (Ez. 14:13). ... “Though these three men, Noah, Daniel and Job, were in it they should deliver but their own souls by their righteousness, saith the LORD GOD” (Ez. 14:14).
 
With the assurance of God's pending judgment against a nation that turned from their founder, God pens chapter 16. Therein the graphic description of Judah's harlotry would cause any modest human to blush, and cause one who knows America's history and current plight, to weep.
America, haunted in its feminized modernist churches, steeped in its cause of sodomy, leisure in its slaying of innocent unborn babies for convenience, and schooled in banning Jesus Christ the Creator and Savior from its children, is ripe for judgment.
We have few Noahs, Daniels, or Jobs preaching righteousness in our streets.
 
“Though these three men were in it, as I live, saith the Lord GOD, they shall deliver neither sons nor daughters; they only shall be delivered, but the land shall be desolate.” Please America, “Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and ye perish from the way” (Psalm 2:12).
 
 
----------oOo---------
 
 
"And he (the beast) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week (seven years): and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease....." (Daniel 9:27).

Obama: Israeli-Palestinian peace talks might focus first on possible border

By Glenn Kessler - Friday, September 10, 2010

President Obama on Friday signaled that Israeli and Palestinian negotiators might begin their peace talks by focusing on the potential border between the two states in order to overcome conflicts over Israeli settlement growth on the West Bank.
Describing his efforts to persuade Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to extend the 10-month moratorium, which expires this month, Obama told reporters during a news conference: "Ultimately, the way to solve these problems is for the two sides to agree what's going to be Israel, what's going to be the state of Palestine. And if you can get that agreement, then you can start constructing anything that the people of Israel see fit in undisputed areas."
The borders-first approach has drawn increasing attention from Middle East experts, and has been endorsed by such Arab figures as Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.
Then-President George W. Bush angered Palestinians in 2004 when he gave then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon a letter stating that Israel could expect to keep major settlement blocks as part as any peace deal, but increasingly officials think that identifying up front the settlement areas Israel could keep would reduce settlements as a source of tension between the two sides.
Still, the most contentious area of any peace deal is likely to be the division of Jerusalem, where Israel has claimed Palestinian areas within its municipal boundaries and has surrounded the city with settlements. Jerusalem is expected to be the last item the two sides tackle. Other important "final status" issues include the right of return for Palestinian refugees, or at least compensation for the loss of their homes, as well as security and control of resources such as water.
Obama launched new talks between Israeli and Palestinian leaders this month, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will travel to the Middle East next week to foster a second round. The president acknowledged that "a major bone of contention during the course of this month is going to be the potential lapse of the settlement moratorium."
U.S. officials originally hoped that the talks would start at the onset of the moratorium, making it more difficult for Israel to allow it to lapse if the talks were making progress. But Palestinians balked at direct talks until recently, and now the administration has only a few weeks to demonstrate that the talks are a success. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has warned that he will terminate the discussions if settlement construction begins again.
Obama said he is making the case that the settlement freeze should continue. "What I've said to Prime Minister Netanyahu is that given, so far, the talks are moving forward in a constructive way, it makes sense to extend that moratorium so long as the talks are moving in a constructive way," Obama said.
But he noted that the prime minister faces a "very difficult" political environment in Israel, where members of his coalition have threatened to bring down the government if settlement construction does not begin anew. "One of the things that I've said to President Abbas is, you've got to show the Israeli public that you are serious and constructive in these talks so that the politics for Prime Minister Netanyahu - if he were to extend the settlements moratorium - would be a little bit easier," he said. End item. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The confirmation ceremony signals the first day of the seven-year tribulation. The Church will not enter the tribulation. Based on past practice, the whole world will see this event live on TV with much pomp and circumstance. I get goose bumps just thinking about meeting our Lord and Savior in the air!! Our Lord commands us to watch!
 
"If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee" (Revelation 3:3).
 
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).

----------oOo---------
 
 
"And he (the beast) shall confirm the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)"[Daniel 9:27].

Sep 17, 2010
AMMAN (AFP) – US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Thursday that the Israeli and Palestinian leaders are committed and serious about making peace, which is "within reach."

She was speaking in Amman after talks with Jordanian King Abdullah II as this week´s thorny negotiations continue apace between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas.

"They are serious about this effort. They are committed. They have begun to grapple with the hard but necessary questions," Clinton said of the two.
"With the commitment of an Israeli prime minister and a Palestinian president who both embrace the goal of a two-state solution, peace is once again within reach."

Speaking at a news conference with Jordanian counterpart Nasser Judeh, she said Netanyahu and Abbas "can make the difficult decisions necessary to resolve all the... issues within one year."

She added that she is "convinced that this is the time and these are the leaders who can achieve the results we all seek, two states, two peoples living in peace and security."

Clinton met Abbas earlier in Ramallah, and he publicly pledged his support for the US-backed peace talks despite continuing difficulties over the question of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Abbas said "conditions are difficult" but that "there is no choice but negotiations."

Abbas spokesman Nabil Abu Rudeina said the talks were "in-depth and serious" and that the discussions would continue on the sidelines of next week´s UN General Assembly meeting.

But a senior Palestinian official said the "gap remains wide" on the settlements dispute despite Clinton´s intervention during two days of talks in Egypt and Jerusalem.

The discussions "were difficult and made no progress," he said of a trilateral meeting in Jerusalem on Wednesday.

At that meeting Abbas again threatened to quit the peace talks if Israel did not renew a moratorium on the construction of new homes in West Bank settlements that expires at the end of the month, a senior aide said.


Netanyahu has so far refused to extend the partial ban despite the urging of US President Barack Obama, though he has hinted he would confine building to major settlement blocs.


The Palestinians want to focus on reaching a deal on final borders as a way of resolving the settlements dispute, and US mediators have suggested a three-month extension of the moratorium to allow for such a deal, the Palestinian official said on Thursday.

Some 500,000 Israelis live in more than 120 Jewish settlements across the West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories expected to form the bulk of a future Palestinian state.

US envoy George Mitchell said late on Wednesday that talks this week had made "progress" on the settlements issue.

He also said the two leaders again tackled the issues at the heart of their decades-old conflict -- Israel´s security, the borders of a future Palestinian state, the fate of Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem.
"The two leaders are not leaving the tough issues to the end of the process," Mitchell told reporters.

"We take this as a strong indicator that peace is possible and of their desire to conclude an agreement."

Mitchell met Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Damascus on Thursday, and spoke of Washington´s desire for an "agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, between Israel and Syria and between Israel and Lebanon and the full normalisation of relations between Israel and its neighbours."
Syria´s SANA news agency quoted Assad as telling him: "Peace cannot last unless it restores full rights to their owners in accordance with international resolutions."

In Cairo, Arab League chief Amr Mussa told Arab foreign ministers: "Given that the essence of Israeli policies remains unchanged, and despite the doubts of some about the goals of these negotiations, we take the sage position of giving it a chance."
And Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak said peace could be achieved in half a year if Israel extended the settlement moratorium.

"What are three or for months, for the sake of the continuation of the peace talks and for the sake of reaching an agreement in three or six months," Mubarak said in an Israeli television interview due to air on Saturday, extracts of which were carried by state news agency MENA.
He called on Netanyahu to take the "difficult decision" of freezing settlement construction, MENA said.

In Brussels, EU foreign ministers issued a statement urging Israel to extend the moratorium.(Copyright © 2010 Agence France Presse. 09/16/10)

MATERIAL REPRODUCED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

In the book of Revelation, chapter 13, some details are given about the first beast, commonly known as the antichrist:
 
"And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over ALL kindreds, and tongues, and NATIONS" (Rev.13:7).
 
It is an indisputable Biblical fact that the U.S. will be under the authority of the first beast as he will have authority over "ALL NATIONS."
 
Yes, the U.S. is still A NATION. This means one of two things must happen; either the U.S. will produce the beast, or will be conquered by him. At this time the U.S. has the most powerful military in the history of the world. For the first time in its history, the U.S. has no formidable military foe. I repeat the Scripture:
 
"And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him" (Rev. 13:4). NOBODY!

"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words"
(I Thessalonians 4:16-18).


----------oOo---------
 
 
"Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: (Titus 2:13).
April 29, 2010
 
A Stranger in Our Midst
 
By Robert Weissberg, Professor of Political Science - Emeritus at the University of Illinois , Urbana
 
As the Obama administration enters its second year, I -- and undoubtedly millions of others -- have struggled to develop a shorthand term that captures our emotional unease. Defining this discomfort is tricky. I reject nearly the entire Obama agenda, but the term "being opposed" lacks an emotional punch. Nor do terms like "worried" or "anxious" apply. I was more worried about America 's future during the Johnson or Carter years, so it's not that dictionary, either. Nor, for that matter, is this about backroom odious deal-making and pork, which are endemic in American politics.
 
After auditioning countless political terms, I finally realized that the Obama administration and its congressional collaborators almost resemble a foreign occupying force, a coterie of politically and culturally non-indigenous leaders whose rule contravenes local values rooted in our national tradition. It is as if the United States has been occupied by a foreign power, and this transcends policy objections. It is not about Obama's birthplace. It is not about race, either; millions of white Americans have had black mayors and black governors, and this unease about out-of-synch values never surfaced.
 
The term I settled on is "alien rule" -- based on outsider values, regardless of policy benefits -- that generates agitation. This is what bloody anti-colonial strife was all about. No doubt, millions of Indians and Africans probably grasped that! expelling the British guaranteed economic ruin and even worse governance, but at least the mess would be their mess. Just travel to Afghanistan and witness American military commanders' efforts to enlist tribal elders with promises of roads, clean water, dental clinics, and all else that America can freely provide. Many of these elders probably privately prefer abject poverty to foreign occupation since it would be their poverty, run by their people, according to their sensibilities.
 
This disquiet was a slow realization. Awareness began with Obama's odd pre-presidency associations, decades of being oblivious to Rev. Wright's anti-American ranting, his enduring friendship with the terrorist guy-in-the-neighborhood Bill Ayers, and the Saul Alinsky-flavored anti-capitalist community activism. Further add a hazy personal background -- an Indonesian childhood, shifting official names, and a paperless-trail climb through elite educational institutions.
 
None of this disqualified Obama from the presidency; rather, this background just doesn't fit with the conventional political résumé. It is just the "outsider" quality that alarms. For all the yammering about George W. Bush's privileged background, his made-in-the-USA persona was absolutely indisputable. John McCain might be embarrassed about his Naval Academy class rank and iffy combat performance, but there was never any doubt of his authenticity. Countless conservatives despised Bill Clinton, but nobody ever, ever doubted his good-old-boy American bonafides.
 
The suspicion that Obama is an outsider, a figure who really doesn't "get" America , grew clearer from his initial appointments. What "native" would appoint Kevin Jennings, a militant gay activist, to oversee school safety? Or permit a Marxist rabble-rouser to be a "green jobs czar"? How about an Attorney General who began by accusing Americans of cowardice when it comes to discussing race? And who can forget Obama's weird defense of his pal Louis Henry Gates from "racist" Cambridge , Massachusetts cops? If the American Revolution had never occurred and the Queen had appointed Obama Royal Governor (after his distinguished service in Kenya ), a trusted locally attuned aide would have first whispered in his ear, "Mr. Governor General, here in America , we do not automatically assume that the police were at fault," and the day would have been saved.
 
And then there's the "we are sorry, we'll never be arrogant again" rhetoric seemingly designed for a future President of the World election campaign.

"And power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues and nations"
(Revelation 13:7)?

What made Obama's Cairo utterances so distressing was how they grated on American cultural sensibilities. And he just doesn't notice, perhaps akin to never hearing Rev. Wright anti-American diatribes. An American president does not pander to third-world audiences by lying about the Muslim contribution to America . Imagine Ronald Reagan, or any past American president, trying to win friends by apologizing. This appeal contravenes our national character and far exceeds a momentary embarrassment about garbled syntax or poor delivery. Then there's Obama's bizarre, totally unnecessary deep bowing to foreign potentates. Americans look foreign leaders squarely in the eye and firmly shake hands; we don't bow.
 
But far worse is Obama's tone-deafness about American government. How can any ordinary American, even a traditional liberal, believe that jamming through unpopular, debt-expanding legislation that consumes one-sixth of our GDP, sometimes with sly side-payments and with a thin majority, will eventually be judged legitimate? This is third-world, maximum-leader-style politics. That the legislation was barely understood even by its defenders and vehemently championed by a representative of that typical American city, San Francisco , only exacerbates the strangeness. And now President Obama sides with illegal aliens over the State of Arizona , which seeks to enforce the federal immigration law to protect American citizens from marauding drug gangs and other miscreants streaming in across the Mexican border.
 
Reciprocal public disengagement from President Obama is strongly suggested by recent poll data on public trust in government. According to a recent Pew report, only 22% of those asked trust the government always or most of the time, among the lowest figures in half a century. And while pro-government support has been slipping for decades, the Obama presidency has sharply exacerbated this drop. To be sure, many factors (in particular the economic downturn) contribute to this decline, but remember that Obama was recently elected by an often wildly enthusiastic popular majority. The collapse of trust undoubtedly transcends policy quibbles or a sluggish economy -- it is far more consistent with a deeper alienation.
 
Perhaps the clearest evidence for this "foreigner in our midst" mentality is the name given our resistance -- tea parties, an image that instantly invokes the American struggle against George III, a clueless foreign ruler from central casting. This history-laden label was hardly predetermined, but it instantly stuck (as did the election of Sen. Scott Brown as "the shot heard around the world" and tea partiers dressing up in colonial-era costumes). Perhaps subconsciously, Obama does remind Americans of when the U.S. was really occupied by a foreign power. A Declaration of Independence passage may still resonate: "HE [George III] has erected a Multitude of new Offices [Czars], and sent hither Swarms of Officers [recently hired IRS agents] to harass our People, and eat out the Substance."
What's next? End item.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"And power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues and nations"
(Revelation 13:7)?

"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).
 


----------oOo---------
 
 
"It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes" (Psalm 118:9).
 
President´s socialist takeover
(WASHINGTON TIMES COMMENTARY) By Jeffrey T. Kuhner 07/23/10)
 
President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.
 
He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela´s leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above - one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines.
 
He has abused his office and violated his oath to uphold the Constitution. His health care overhaul was rammed through Congress. It was - and remains - opposed by a majority of the people. It could only be passed through bribery and political intimidation. The Louisiana Purchase, the Cornhusker Kickback, the $5 billion Medicaid set-aside for Florida Sen. Bill Nelson - taxpayer money was used as a virtual slush fund to buy swing votes.
Moreover, the law is blatantly unconstitutional: The federal government does not have the right to coerce every citizen to purchase a good or service. This is not in the Constitution, and it represents an unprecedented expansion of power.
 
Yet Obamacare´s most pernicious aspect is its federal funding of abortion. Pro-lifers are now compelled to have their tax dollars used to subsidize insurance plans that allow for the murder of unborn children. This is more than state-sanctioned infanticide. It violates the conscience rights of religious citizens. Traditionalists - evangelicals, Catholics, Baptists, Muslims, Orthodox Jews - have been made complicit in an abomination that goes against their deepest religious values. As the law is implemented (as in Pennsylvania) the consequences of the abortion provisions will become increasingly apparent. The result will be a cultural civil war. Pro-lifers will become deeply alienated from society; among many, a secession of the heart is taking place.
 
Mr. Obama is waging a frontal assault on property rights. The BP oil spill is a case in point. BP clearly is responsible for the spill and its massive economic and environmental damage to the Gulf. There is a legal process for claims to be adjudicated, but Mr. Obama has behaved more like Mr. Chavez or Russia´s Vladimir Putin: He has bullied BP into setting up a $20 billion compensation fund administered by an Obama appointee. In other words, the assets of a private company are to be raided to serve a political agenda. Billions will be dispensed arbitrarily in compensation to oil-spill victims - much of it to Democratic constituents. This is cronyism and creeping authoritarianism.
 
Mr. Obama´s multicultural socialism seeks to eradicate traditional America. He has created a command-and-control health care system. He has essentially nationalized the big banks, the financial sector, the automakers and the student loan industry. He next wants to pass "cap- and-trade," which would bring industry and manufacturing under the heel of big government. The state is intervening in every aspect of American life - beyond its constitutionally delegated bounds. Under Mr. Obama, the Constitution has become a meaningless scrap of paper.
 
"And he (the beast) shall confirm the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)" (Daniel 9:27).
 
"And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations" (Revelation 13:7).
 
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).
 
 
----------oOo---------


THE 2010 TOP ANTI-ISRAEL LIES
Date: Jan 26, 2011 12:43 PM
Published by the
Simon Wiesenthal Center, (Adapted by FLAME) edited for length*
LIE #1: Israel was created by European guilt over the Nazi Holocaust. Why should Palestinians pay the price? The Truth: Three thousand years before the Holocaust, before there was a Roman Empire, Israel's kings and prophets lived in Jerusalem. The whole world knows that Isaiah did not speak his prophesies from Portugal, nor Jeremiah his lamentations from France. Revered by its people, Jerusalem is mentioned in the Hebrew scriptures 600 times—but not once in the Koran. Throughout its 2,000-year exile there was continuous Jewish presence in the Holy Land, with the modern rebirth of Israel beginning in the 1800s. Reclamation of the largely vacant land by pioneering Zionists blossomed. The Jewish State was created by a two-thirds vote of the UN in 1947. Soon 800,000 Jews fleeing persecution in Arab countries arrived. In ensuing decades, Israel absorbed a million immigrants from the Soviet Union and thousands of Ethiopian Jews. Today, far from being a vestige of European guilt or colonialism, Israel is a diverse, cosmopolitan society, fulfilling the age-old dream of a people's journey and 'Return to Zion'- their ancient homeland.
 
LIE #2: Had Israel withdrawn to its June 1967 borders, peace would have come long ago. The Truth: Since 1967, Israel has repeatedly conceded "land for peace." Following Egyptian President Sadat's historic 1977 visit to Jerusalem and the Camp David Peace Accords, Israel withdrew from the vast Sinai Peninsula and has been at peace with Egypt ever since. In 1995, Jordan signed a peace treaty with Israel but neither the Palestinians nor 21 other Arab states have done so. In 1993, Israel signed the Oslo Accords ceding administrative control of the West Bank to the PA (formerly the PLO). The PA never fulfilled its promise to end propaganda attacks and drop the Palestinian National Charter's call for Israel's destruction. In 2000, Prime Minister Barak offered Yasser Arafat full sovereignty over 97% of the West Bank, a corridor to Gaza, and a capitol in the Arab section of Jerusalem. Arafat said NO. In 2008, PA President Abbas nixed virtually the same offer from Prime Minister Olmert. In 2005, Prime Minister Sharon unilaterally withdrew from Gaza. Taken over by terrorist Hamas, they turned dismantled Jewish communities into launching sites for suicide bombers and 8,000+ rockets into Israel proper. In 2010, Prime Minister Netanyahu renewed offers of unconditional negotiations leading to a Palestinian State, but Palestinians refused, demanding more unilateral Israeli concessions, including a total freeze of all Israeli construction in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
 
LIE #3: Israel is the main stumbling block to achieving a two-state solution.
The Truth:
The Palestinians themselves are the only stumbling block to achieving a Two-State solution. With whom should Israel negotiate? With his Palestinian Authority, which continues to glorify terrorists and preaches hate in its educational system and the media? With Hamas, whose Iranian-backed leaders deny the Holocaust and use fanatical jihadist rhetoric to call for Israel's destruction? Today, it is a simple fact that while the State of Israel is prepared to recognize all Arab States, secular or Muslim, these states adamantly refuse to recognize Israel as a Jewish State and demand "the right of return" of five million so-called Palestinian "refugees"—a sure guarantee for Israel's demise.
 
LIE #4: Nuclear Israel not Iran is the greatest threat to peace and stability.
The Truth:
Though never acknowledged by Jerusalem, it is generally assumed that Israel has nuclear weapons. But unlike Pakistan, India, and North Korea, Israel never conducted nuclear tests. In 1973, when its very survival was imperiled by the surprise Egyptian-Syrian Yom Kippur attack, many assumed Israel would use nuclear weapons—but it did not. Contrary to public condemnations, many Arab leaders privately express relief that Israeli nuclear deterrence exists. While Israel has never threatened anyone, Tehran's mullahs daily threaten to "wipe Israel from the map." The U.S. and Europe can afford to wait to see what the Iranian regime does with its nuclear ambitions. But Israel cannot. She is on the front lines and remembers every day the price the Jewish people paid for not taking Hitler at his word. Israel is not prepared to sacrifice another six million Jews on the altar of the world's indifference.
 
LIE #5: Israel is an Apartheid State deserving of International Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaigns. The Truth: On both sides of the Atlantic, church groups, academics and unions are leading deceitful and often anti-Semitic boycott campaigns demonizing what they call the Jewish "apartheid" State. The truth is that unlike apartheid South Africa, Israel is a democratic state. Its 20% Arab minority enjoys all the political, economic and religious rights and freedoms of citizenship, including electing members of their choice to the Knesset (Parliament). Israeli Arabs and Palestinians have standing before Israel's Supreme Court. In contrast, no Jew may own property in Jordan, no Christian or Jew can visit Islam's holiest sites in Saudi Arabia.
 
LIE #6: Israeli policies are the cause of worldwide anti-Semitism.
 
LIE #7: The only hope for peace is a single, bi-national state, eliminating the Jewish State of Israel. The Truth: The one-state solution, promoted by academics, is a non-starter because it would eliminate the Jewish homeland. However, the current pressures on Israel are equally dangerous. In effect, the world is demanding that Israel, the size of New Jersey, shrink further by accepting a three-state solution: a PA state on the West Bank and a Hamas terrorist state controlling 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza. All this, as Hezbollah, Iran's proxy in Lebanon, stockpiles 50,000 rockets, threatening northern and central Israel's main population centers. In 2010, most Middle East experts believe that the only hope for enduring peace is two states with defined final borders. But too many diplomats, pundits, academics and church leaders ignore the fact that current polls show that while most Israelis favor peace, most Palestinians continue to oppose it.
FINAL COMMENT: Israel has been accused of causing a “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza. This was also not true as Israel handed over their own land once more in a futile attempt for peace. Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz denounced Goldstone's Report (a biased UN Report written by a rabid anti-Semite,) as a modern "blood libel" accusing Israeli soldiers of crimes they never committed.
 

----------oOo---------


"And he (the beast) shall confirm (guarantee) the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)" [Daniel 9:27].

U.S. supports Israel’s security, Obama tells Jewish leaders
March 2, 2011
Obama met Tuesday with members of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
A statement issued by the White House called the one-hour discussion "productive." The statement said that Obama "reiterated America’s unshakeable support for Israel’s security, opposition to any effort to de-legitimize it or single it out for criticism, and commitment to achieve a peace that will secure the future for Arabs and Israelis alike."Obama, according to the statement, "praised the core Jewish values of freedom and democracy, human rights, and tikkun olam (to repair the world)."
The president thanked the Jewish community leaders for their support "to ensure that America continues to out-educate, out-innovate, and out-build the competition in order to win the future."
The delegation also met with Dennis Ross, the senior White House adviser on Middle East peace issues; Dan Shapiro, senior director for the Middle East and North Africa at the National Security Council; and David Cohen, the Department of Treasury’s acting under secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, according to Haaretz.
 
"Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: (Titus 2:13).
 
 
----------oOo---------
 
 
"And he (the beast) shall confirm the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)"[Daniel 9:27].

PM likely to unveil diplomatic initiative in DC in May
By HERB KEINON

03/03/2011

Ross meets Netanyahu, as efforts focused on keeping Quartet from issuing statement tilting toward Palestinian demands.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's new diplomatic initiative is likely to be unveiled in Washington in May, possibly during an address to Congress.
In the meantime, his envoy ? Yitzhak Molcho ? is expected to ask Qk Quartet representatives travelling to Jerusalem next week to refrain from issuing statements fundamentally changing the Quartet's position on the conflict, until Netanyahu unveils his new initiative.
Discussions are being held between Jerusalem and Congressional representatives about organizing a speech in Congress when Netanyahu goes to Washington to address the annual AIPAC policy conference, scheduled to begin May 22.
Netanyahu met Thursday with White House senior advisor Dennis Ross, who is in the country with a team of Middle East experts ? including Fred Hoff and Mara Rudmann from US envoy George Mitchell's team ? for talks. Hoff is Mitchell's speciaalist on Syria and Lebanon.

Ross and Hoff met Defense Minster Ehud Barak, whose influence on Netanyahu is reportedly on the rise, and who is urging the prime minister to place a new Israeli initiative on the international agenda.
Barak, in a Channel 10 interview, said an initiative is essential to maintain Israel's position in the world, ensure future US security assistance, and fend off delegitimization.
While Barak said a major policy address in the US by Netanyahu in May would be important, this was a long way off, and there were immediate diplomatic challenges for Israel on the immediate horizon.
One such challenge is the Quartet principals meeting scheduled for March 15 in Paris, to be attended by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, EU foreign policy chief Catherin Ashton, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, and UN General Secretary Ban Ki-moon.
Barak said that if that forum issued a statement showing movement closer to the Palestinians position, Israel would "be in a worse position. I think we have a lot to lose from passivity." There is some concern that the Quartet may come out and endorse a key Palestinians position -- that a future state be along the 1967 lines.
Both Netanyahu and Barak are demanding, especially in light of the changes in the Arab world, that Israel retain a security presence along the Jordan River.
While Netanyahu is keeping details of any new initiative very close to his chest, Barak hinted at a direction, saying there was a widespread understanding of the need to move ? in a phased, graduall manner ? toward an agreed upon objective.
Netanyahu did not shed any light on his plan in a meeting Thursday with Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt.
According to diplomatic officials, Bildt brought a message that Netanyahu has heard from other European leaders in recent days: the need solve the Palestinian issue now to keep it from becoming an issue that could be used by Islamic radicals to their advantage in any future election in Egypt or other Arab states now going through an upheaval.
While there is some speculation that Netanyahu is interested in a Palestinian state within temporary borders, with the final borders to be negotiated at a later date, others believe that Netanyahu's plain entails a reiteration of the goal of two states, and the announcement that the IDF will turn control over all the major cities in the West Bank over to the PA, giving them control over some 90 percent of the Palestinian population. Under this plan, the IDF would no longer operate inside the cities, except where in extraordinary circumstances.

"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).

----------oOo---------
 
 
"And he (the antichrist beast) shall confirm (guarantee) the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)" [Daniel 9:27].

U.K.: Mideast peace process is too vital to fail over regional turmoil
Britain's Foreign Secretary Hague meets with Palestinian President Abbas in London and demands both sides resume discussions and seek a breakthrough on a permanent peace deal before end of 2011.
 
MARCH 9, 2011 - By The Associated Press
Britain warned on Tuesday of a risk that the Middle East peace process could fall victim to the unrest sweeping the region if Israel and the Palestinians don't return quickly to stalled talks.
Foreign Secretary William Hague met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in London and demanded both sides resume discussions and seek a breakthrough on a permanent peace deal before the end of the year. End item ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Learned Christians know the first day of the seven-year tribulation is indicated by an event (Daniel 9:27) and that the Church will not enter the seven-year tribulation. The Church Age goes up to, but not into, the seven years of tribulation.
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be CAUGHT UP together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord" (I Thess. 4:16 & 17).
 
----------oOo---------
 
ISRAEL; THE FIG TREE
March 10, 2011

"Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is nigh: So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away" (Matthew 24:32-35).

A rare history lesson: The truth about Israel and Palestine

Thursday, February 3, 2011 - Forbidden Table Talk by Bob Siegel
 
SAN DIEGO - February 3, 2011 - The verbalbal battle over American Egyptian policy goes back and forth. Yes, President Mubarak has ruled as a ruthless dictator. Yes, the idea of overthrowing this man and replacing his rule with an honest democracy sounds pleasant, but when the fine hand of Muslim Brotherhood appears to be pulling the marionette strings, one asks if Egypt’s potential revolution will simply pull people out of the frying pan and into the fire. The Muslim Brotherhood, for example, is not particularly shy about its goal of liquidating Jewish inhabitants in the Holy Land.
 
There has been no love lost between Israel and Egypt over the years and Egypt probably never would have agreed to the current peace treaty if not for an eagerness to regain control over the Sinai, taken by Israel after Egypt attempted to wipe Israel off the face of the map back in the Six Day War. Still, for whatever reasons, Egypt, under its present form of government, is at least (technically) at peace with Israel. This will change immediately under the Muslim Brotherhood. Although few Americans would believe (or admit even if they did believe) that Israel should be destroyed, far too many are willing nevertheless to throw a good deal of the blame Israel’s direction as a result of her “illegal occupation of Palestine.”
 
There are few subjects laced with more historical revision than the subject of the Middle East. For a tragic example, one need look no further than Former President, Jimmy Carter insisting that Jews should have peace talks even with the terrorist group, Hamas.
And who could forget Washington correspondent Helen Thomas’ call for the Jews to “get the hell out of Palestine” True, she apologized out of fear for her job. Then, after losing her job anyway, she admitted that the statement leaves her with no moral regrets.
Speaking to Scott Spears on local Ohio station WNRN 1490AM, October 18, 2010, Thomas said, “I had to [apologize] because everyone was so upset. I hit the third rail. You cannot criticize Israel in this country and survive.”
 
When Spears asked why she made the comment in the first place, Thomas said, “Because it’s the truth. The Israelis, they’re very aggressive. They have refused to enforce or go along with some 65 UN resolutions.”
 
One might be tempted to comment on the utter ignorance of a prestigious journalist, but such a comment would garner fierce resistance from many sincere, misled people. Unfortunately, we have reached a point where one cannot defend Israel anymore without sounding as if he is supporting some imperial aggressor, even though Israel is a tiny country smaller than the state of New Jersey. And yet, despite this size, Israel seems to be the concern of countries all over the world, regardless of which hemisphere they inhabit or which ocean they border. And so, in order to defend Israel more accurately, this writer will challenge the mythology by answering some commonly asked questions.
 
“Do the Jews even have a right to be in the Middle East at all? Wasn’t there a group of indigenous people called the Palestinians, living there since the beginning of measured history? Didn’t Jews arrive after World War Two and conquer land that did not belong to them?”
 
This is utterly and completely false! The Jews lived in that land since the time of Moses and despite some upsets from the Syrians and Babylonians, remained in the land for some two thousand years until the Romans displaced them. Prince Titus destroyed the temple in 70 AD. Then in the second century, Emperor Hadrian crushed a new Jewish rebellion. This time, many of the Jews were banished and others were made slaves of the Romans. A small number of Jews did stay in the land and remained there right up through the twentieth century.
However, the name of the land at this time was changed because Hadrian wanted to destroy Jewish identity. He renamed the land “Syria-Palestinian.” Palestine was a Latin version of the word Philistine, an ancient enemy of the Jews who were now extinct as a people. Hadrian was deliberately insulting the Jews. There has never been a country called Palestine. This was a nickname for the Holy Land under the Romans. The people who today call themselves Palestinians are Arabs and they referred to themselves as Arabs for centuries until they were dubbed “Palestinians” as a publicity ploy by the terrorist and founder of the PLO, Yassir Arafat, who himself did not use the title “Palestinian” until after the year 1964.
 
“Even if this is true, well then, OK. These Arabs lived in the land for centuries.”
 
In ancient times Arabs could be found in many places but they did not occupy the Holy Land in any significant number until after the time of Mohammad and the spread of Islam. Muslims conquered the land from the Byzantine Church (remnants of the converted, Roman Empire). Through the years, with Crusades and other wars, the land switched ownership back and forth between the Catholic Church and the Muslims. Eventually it fell into the hands of another Muslim empire, the Ottomans. After defeating the Ottomans in World War One, the Middle East found itself under the domain of Great Britain.
 
Even though the Middle East became a prize of the British Empire, England had neither the desire nor ability to run that region of the world forever. For this reason, they began working to create a series of new states in which the Arabs (who had helped them defeat the Ottoman Empire) could administer their own affairs. Although the term “Arabia” was already a general description for a large part of this area, many of the Middle East countries we know of today did not officially become independent nations until the British occupation and subsequent withdrawal from this turbulent region of the world.
 
While working to create new, multiple states, Great Britain (with the cooperation of the League of Nations, an early proto-type of the United Nations) decided they would also offer an opportunity for Jews all over the world to return to their homeland. This invitation was called the Balfour Declaration. Needless to say, grateful Jews responded with terrific enthusiasm. Indeed, many children of Abraham did migrate from Russia, Western Europe, and other corners of the globe where they had lived for some two thousand years in ghettos at the mercy of pogroms or harsh policies of Ant-Semitic governments. A homeland of their own had been a hopeful vision to the Jews for two millennia. The most familiar Jewish toast (common at Passover celebrations) said “Next year in Jerusalem.” But few thought they were reciting much more than a pipe dream. Now they could really, truly return to Jerusalem! Just imagine how this must have felt! The Jews were going to sojourn to a country of their own, and not just any country; the very land of their ancestors, a land where a remnant of Jews had remained since ancient times, living side by side with Muslims and Christians who also had interests in Palestine and who viewed it as their Holy Land too.
 
"What exactly was offered to the Hebrew immigrants by the League of Nations?"
 
Everything we would today call Israel, everything we would today call Jordan and most of what we would today call “the occupied territories.”
 
When the Jews arrived, many of them purchased land from Arab lords. In time, a terrain that had been little more than a desolate, flee bitten combination of swamp and desert, swiftly turned green with farmland and transplanted trees. The economy also boomed, transforming this area in such an amazing way, that the term metamorphoses barely does justice. New jobs were created, resulting in an influx of Arabs from other regions who now saw Palestine as a land of opportunity and employment made possible by Jewish farmers and businessmen recently arrived from Europe.
 
"What was the proportion of Arab and Jew in Palestine prior to the Balfour Declaration in 1917? "
 
More Arabs than Jews inhabited the land at this time (resulting from previous Muslim expansion) but the truth is, there was really only a handful of each people group, because again, the swamp like conditions limited the kind of life one could realistically enjoy in the Holy Land. The famous author, Mark Twain wrote as much after his own personal visit. He was surprised how desolate the Holy Land looked, how little was going on there and how few people inhabited the area.
 
All of this changed when the League of Nations invited Jews to resettle their ancient home. Ironically, it was after Jewish business created a surplus of jobs that Arabs flooded into the territory in mass, creating a situation where the Arabs greatly outnumbered the Jews.
In paradoxical fashion, the British, after inviting the Jews to return, sold over 75 percent of Palestine to the Arabs, creating a new country called, Trans-Jordan. This is an extremely important and seldom taught fact. Please catch this: 75 percent of what had been offered to the Jews was sold behind their backs to the Arabs instead! Not only were the Arabs offered a “separate Palestinian state,” long ago, but they have been living in one since the early part of the Twentieth Century. It’s called Jordan, a country three times the size of what remained for the Jews.
 
The Jews accepted this betrayal, only because they had no choice. After all, a sliver of the promise was better than no land at all.
 
But the Arabs didn’t want the Jews to have even a sliver and fresh controversy broke out over what to do with the remaining 25 percent.
 
To appease the Arabs, the United Nations voted to divvy up the remaining 25 percent between the Jews and the Arabs. The Jews accepted this partition. The Arabs did not.
After the partition vote from the United Nations, Israel declared its Independence on May 14, 1948. One day later, five Arab armies invaded Israel from Egypt, Tran Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq.
 
Important Note: This war had nothing to do with allowing a two state solution. Indeed, the Arabs waged war because they were rejecting a two state solution. Their stated goal was the complete extermination of Israel!
 
From Abid Saud King of Saudi Arabia 1947:
 
“ There are fifty million Arabs. What does it matter if we lose ten million people to kill all of the Jews. The price is worth it.”
 
From Azam Pasha, Secretary General of the Arabs League 1947:
 
“This will be a war of extermination and momentous massacre, which will be spoken of like the Mongolian Massacres.”
 
From Haj Amin El Hussein Mufti of Jerusalem 1947:
 
“ I declare a holy war my Moslem brothers. Murder the Jews! Murder them all!”
Jews pleaded with Palestinian Arabs to remain in their homes. Although many of the Arabs did flee or join the invading armies, a considerable portion of Arabs remained in Israel. This interesting fact is seldom discussed. About 300,000 Arabs fled Israel and about 160,000 remained. Today Israel still contains a vital Arab population and these Arabs have more rights in Israel than any other Arab in any Arab country! In fact, shortly before Yassir Arafat’s death, when there was talk (once again) under the Bush administration, of a “separate Palestinian state” the Arab citizens in Israel were asked if they wanted to move, renouncing their Israeli citizenship, and live in the Palestine sector. Guess what they decided! Some of them probably fell on the floor laughing before saying to the Israeli government, “Oh, I’m sorry. You were serious.”
 
In 1948, when Israel beat the odds and defeated five invading nations, the problem of refugees came up. We always hear about the Arab refugees from Israel. But they were not the only refugees. Hundreds of thousands of Jews were kicked out of Arab lands too. All of the Jewish refugees were welcomed into Israel where as Arabs who wanted to resettle in Arab countries were (for the most part) denied admission. Jordan was an exception but even in Jordan most of the refugees were confined to camps. They lived in that condition all the way up to 1967, when Israel annexed Jordan’s West Bank. Prior to 1967 there was no significant ongoing discussion amongst the countries of the world regarding Jordan’s treatment of the “poor Palestinians.”
 
On December 11, 1948, the United Nations drafted and ratified Resolution 194. This was a call for the Arab states and Israel to resolve the refugee/resettlement issues but the condition was that all returning citizens would agree to live in peace. Receiving no such guarantee from the Arabs, Israel decided to postpone repatriation until her neighbors would recognize her right to exist.
 
In 1967, nine different nations (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Algeria, Kuwait, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq), declared war on Israel and promised to exterminate every Jew.
“Egypt is ready to plunge into a total war that will be the end of Israel” (Radio Cairo, May 17, 1967).
 
Surprising the world with a preemptive strike, Israel defeated the Arabs in just six days. At that time, their territory was expanded to the West Bank, The Golan Heights, The Gaza Strip, the Sinai, and the remainder of Jerusalem (half of which had been taken over by Jordan after the 1947 war.) This territory is frequently referred to as a part of Israel’s “illegal occupation.” I tend to hate that term and I argue against it for the following reasons:
 
1) When we think of occupying countries, what usually comes to mind is an aggressive empire seeking to conquer and expand, not a tiny little nation that expanded its borders only as a means of survival, to prevent her untrustworthy neighbors from attacking again.
 
2) Most of this land had been legally offered to Israel in the Balfour Declaration anyway, before Great Britain sold it behind Israel’s back.
 
3) Historically, the land had been the home of the Jews for literally thousands of years.
 
4) The United Nations has become so corrupt, I no longer accept their standard as to what is legal or illegal.
 
This is not to say that Israel has not given back land or made peace treaties. The Sinai has been returned and other territories have been slowly transferred to the Palestinian authorities.
But, when two nations make a peace treaty, there is supposed to be give and take on both sides. Israel’s deal (brokered by the U.S) always goes like this. “You give the Palestinians back some land and here is what they will do: They’ll promise to stop killing you.” That’s the deal. Then, shortly after the deal, the promise is broken and missiles are fired into Israel from Gaza (where the Palestinians were finally offered their own autonomous rule) or a suicide bomber kills women and children on a bus.
 
Let me be as straight with my readers as I possibly can. Nothing Israel does, no gesture, no concession, no discussion, will make a hill of beans of difference. They can sign a peace treaty. They can jump on board for a two state solution. It doesn’t matter. Hezbolah wants Israel dead. Al-Qaeda wants Israel dead. Hamas wants Israel dead. But it isn’t limited to the terrorist groups. Muslim Brotherhood wants Israel dead. Palestine itself wants Israel dead. The surrounding Arab nations want Israel dead. The Persian nation of Iran wants Israel dead.
My advice to Israel: Just do what you have to do. Do what you need to do. Do what is right. The world will hate you no matter what action you take and the Arabs will try to kill you no matter how much flowery talk you participate in with our State Department. You may as well just do what’s right.
 
Bob Siegel is a weekend radio talk show host on KCBQ and columnist. Details of his show can be found at www.bobsiegel.net. Comments to posts are discussed by Bob over the air where anyone is free to call in and respond/debate. Call in toll free number: 1-888-344-1170.
----------oOo---------
 
 
15 Mar 2011 20:21:20 -0400 (EDT)

Gen 12:3 "And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.'

JAPAN’S CONNECTION TO ISRAEL :
I have picked up from various sources the following information. As we believers know, any who have consistently gone against Israel’s right to their land eventually pays a stiff price. I am not nor would I ever say the poor people of Japan deserve this- but we have seen this happen before. God still judges nations that try to part HIS land. Do we deny God’s right to judge those who fight against His plan?
Backing up- Last year October 11th, 2010: Prime Minister Dr. Salam Fayyad inaugurated and corner-stoned the Jericho Agro Industrial Park’s infrastructure projects funded by the Government of Japan.
As part of Jericho 10,000 Program, on October 11th, 2010, a ceremony was held at the future site of Jericho Agro-Industrial Park (JAIP) with attendance of (Palestinian) Prime Minister Dr. Salam Fayyad, for the inauguration of the rehabilitation of part of Mahmoud Darwish Street and for the ground-breaking of JAIP land reclamation. The ceremony was attended by Mr. Naofumi Hashimoto, Representative of Japan to the PNA, Mr. Kamel Hemaid, Governor of Jericho and Mr. Hassan Saleh, Mayor of Jericho.
This road rehabilitation is the first infrastructure project to facilitate the traffic in the southern Jericho. Both projects are funded by the Government of Japan with the amount of USD 3.1 million approximately. JAIP is a core project to materialize the concept of creating the Corridor for Peace and Prosperity, which was proposed by Japan, as mid-and-long term efforts for its contribution to the co-existence and co-prosperity of Palestinians and their neighboring countries through cooperation among them. (This is Japan’s answer to the Road Map and also demands a 2-state solution with Israel giving up large sectors of land for peace.) Japan is firmly committed to support the establishment of a viable Palestinian state, and believes that for achieving such goal, a solid basis of sustainable Palestinian economy is indispensable. Japan will support this project of JAIP as part of the PNA Government Program “Homestretch to Freedom”, through continuously working together with Palestinian side as well as with the other partners of Israel and Jordan, in order to start its operation by the end of 2012.
Jan. 11, 2011: Statement by Mr. Seiji Maehara, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan, condemns the demolishing of a part of the Shepherd’s Hotel in E. Jerusalem to construct housing for Jewish people
Japan condemns the demolishing of a part of the Shepherd’s Hotel (*Arab) in East Jerusalem with a view to constructing new housing units for Jewish people. Japan does not recognize any unilateral measures that prejudge the final resolution on pre-1967 borders, nor does Japan recognize the annexation of East Jerusalem by Israel. In this regard, Japan urges Israel to refrain from any unilateral act that could change the existing conditions of East Jerusalem. Ambassador Yutaka Iimura, Special Envoy of the Government of Japan for the Middle East, who was in Israel, has already informed Israeli Government officials of Japanese views.
Feb. 8, 2011: Statement by the Press Secretary, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Japan, on measures by Israel on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip -Japan welcomes the series of economic measures announced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Quartet Representative Tony Blair on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Japan hopes that based on this announcement, measures will be fully and promptly implemented for economic growth as well as for the improvement of the social and living conditions in the Palestinian territories, particularly the Gaza Strip. Japan will pay close attention to any developments surrounding this matter. Japan also hopes that these measures will enhance the mutual trust between the Israeli and Palestinian sides, although they are not a substitute for negotiations for Middle East peace. Japan, for its part, calls upon both parties to exert further efforts for the resumption of peace negotiations.
Feb. 10, 2011: Statement by the Press Secretary, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Japan, concerned over housing in E. Jerusalem for Jewish people
The Government of Japan is concerned about the Jerusalem municipal planning committee’s approval of a plan to build housing units for Jewish people in the Sheih Jarrah of East Jerusalem. Such act goes against the efforts by the international community to resume the negotiations. The Government of Japan does not recognize any act that prejudges the final status of the territories in the pre-1967 borders nor Israel’s annexation of East Jerusalem. Japan urges Israel to refrain from any unilateral act that changes the current situation in East Jerusalem.
Mar. 11, 2011: Statement by Press Secretary/Director-General for Press and Public Relations, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on the decision of the Government of Israel regarding the construction of housing units at settlements in West Bank including East Jerusalem. The Government of Japan deplores the decisions of the Government of Israel to give permission for the construction of 1,600 housing units in East Jerusalem in addition to 112 units in West Bank just after the Israeli and Palestinian leadership’s acceptance of the start of indirect talks. The Government of Japan does not recognize any act that prejudges the final status of Jerusalem and the territories in the pre-1967 borders. Japan demands that the plans should not be implemented. The Government of Japan continues to request strongly that both parties will act in a way that enhances mutual confidence. Japan sincerely hopes that the indirect talks in the peace process will swiftly develop into the resumption of direct talks between the two parties. That’s some pretty strong language?language imposed against God’s people and God’s land. So what happened next???

Mar. 11, 2011: Quake moved Japan coast 8 feet; The Island of Japan drops two feet! The Earth's axis is shifted by 4 inches.
We must understand that when a nation’s leaders issue proclamations/declarations that are in direct opposition and disobedience to the will of God, that nation is being set up to receive God’s judgment. The nation of Japan has not only jumped on the “2-state-solution-band-wagon” to try to bring about peace in the Middle East, but has joined the U.S. and most of the rest of the nations of the world by stepping over into the realm of condemning the nation of Israel and attempting to force their will into Israel’s national and foreign policies. This is a most dangerous place for leaders to put their citizens, for God’s Word is very explicit concerning those who “curse” Israel.
Gen 12:3 And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Take note of the Japanese governments stand concerning Israel relinquishing what it recovered during the 1967 Six Day War.
Hollis Caravetta
 
 
----------oOo---------
 
 
 
Apr 20, 2011 6:31 PM
"And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over ALL kindreds, and tongues, and NATIONS" (Rev.13:7).

The Coming Financial Collapse Is Close

The financial collapse that so many have been anticipating is seemingly at hand. Over the past several weeks, there have been a host of ominous signs for the U.S. economy. Yields on U.S. Treasuries have moved up rapidly and Moody's is publicly warning that it may have to cut the rating on U.S. government debt soon. Mortgage rates are also moving up aggressively. The euro and the U.S. dollar both look incredibly shaky. Jobs continue to be shipped out of the United States at a blistering pace as our politicians stand by and do nothing. Confidence in U.S. government debt around the globe continues to decline. State and local governments that are drowning in debt across the United States are savagely cutting back on even essential social services and are coming up with increasingly "creative" ways of getting more money out of all of us. Meanwhile, tremor after tremor continues to strike the world financial system. So does this mean that we have almost reached a tipping point? Is the world on the verge of a major financial collapse?
 
Many believe a financial crisis could pave the way for the Antichrist Beast to grasp control the world economy and he that controls the money, controls the people.
 
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name" (Revelation 13:16 & 17).
 
 
----------oOo---------
 
 
May 11, 2011 7:59 PM
"
And he (the beast) shall confirm the (Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)" (Daniel 9:27).
 
Obama likely to give ME address ahead of PM’s speech

By
HILARY LEILA KRIEGER IN WASHINGTON AND TOVAH LA
05/12/2011 01:06
 
US president seeks opportunity to lay out new Mideast strategy; may use speech as platform for new Israeli-Palestinian peace proposal.

Photo by: REUTERS/Jim Young

US President Barack Obama is likely to deliver a major address on the Middle East before leaving for a European trip on May 22.
“This would be about political change in the Middle East and North Africa,” an administration official told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday.
RELATED:
The official would not say whether the speech would lay out an American vision for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as many have called for.
Though the date for Obama’s address has not been set, White House aides are indicating that it could come next week. Obama Spokesman Jay Carney said on Wednesday that the president would speak “fairly soon.”
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton first hinted last month that Obama would be making a speech on the Middle East, and it was expected that the president would devote significant attention to the peace process, even though the primary topic would be the revolutions sweeping the region.
Since then, however, Hamas and Fatah entered into a unity-government deal that has complicated the American posture toward engaging the Palestinians, and has pushed Israel away from the negotiating table.
At the same time, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has been threatening to go to the United Nations in September to seek recognition of a unilaterally declared Palestinian state, which neither the US nor Israel want to see happen.
That threat has prompted speculation that through his speech, Obama would try to generate momentum in a different direction.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is due in Washington to deliver his own speech to Congress on May 24. There had been suggestions that he would try to seize the initiative by outlining a new move toward peace ahead of Obama’s address.
Now, however, it seems that the US leader is likely to speak first.
Israel and US officials have been in close contact regarding the upcoming speeches.
The speeches and Netanyahu’s visit – which will include a meeting with Obama on May 20 and a speech before the American Israel Public Affairs Committee three days later – come at a time when both Israelis and Palestinians have insisted that they cannot negotiate.
The Palestinians have long said they will not sit down with Israel until it halts West Bank settlement activity and building Jewish neighborhoods in east Jerusalem.
Israel has said that it will not negotiate with any Palestinian government partnered with Hamas, unless Hamas recognizes the three Quartet principles: renunciation of terrorism, recognition of Israel and acceptance of past agreements.
On Wednesday, Hamas party leader Mahmoud Zahar told Ma’an Radio that recognition of Israel was impossible – even though his organization could accept a Palestinian state along the pre-1967 lines.
Hamas would accept a Palestinian state “on any part of Palestine,” he said in an interview with the Palestinian news agency Ma’an.
Hamas has previously said it is willing to temporarily accept a Palestinian state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The ultimate goal, however, would be a state of “Palestine in its entirety,” the Damascus-based Hamas chief Khaled Mashaal told Charlie Rose of PBS last year.
Formal recognition of Israel, the Gaza-based Zahar, who serves as Hamas’s foreign minister, told Ma’an, would “cancel the right of the next generations to liberate the lands.”
It would jeopardize the right of return for Palestinian refugees who were exiled from the land in 1948, when Israel was recognized by the United Nations, he said.
But he toned down the rhetoric and said Hamas had agreed to maintain Fatah’s truce with Israel.
The gesture was “part of resistance,” and was “not a cancellation,” Zahar said.
“Truce is not peace,” he told Ma’an.
According to the news agency, Fatah leader Nabil Sha’ath said on Tuesday night that a unity government with Hamas could be formed within 10 days, even though Ma’an reported that Abbas had been told that he could not visit Gaza at this time.
According to Ma’an, a new government will be formed within 10 days, and a delegation was likely to head to Cairo on Saturday to discuss its formation.
Last week in Cairo, Hamas and Fatah agreed to the creation of a new technocratic PA government that would hold elections within a year.
Israeli officials said the creation of a government of technocrats would not allay their fears of a Palestinian government linked to Hamas.
The question is who is making the decisions, and telling them what to do, they said. They likened the concept of a technocratic government with fancy attorneys in three-piece suits, hired by the Mafia.
What Hamas is saying is what they have always said: that they want to destroy Israel, and if they are linked to a new Palestinian government, they will continue to work toward Israel’s destruction from the West Bank, the officials said.
Deputy Prime Minister Silvan Shalom said in the Knesset that a renewed Hamas presence in the West Bank would give Iran a foothold there.
“A Hamas state would constitute another branch of Iran in the region,” at a time when the West is struggling against Iran for control of a region which hosts the world’s oil reserves, he said.
“We must make clear to the world that if it recognizes a Palestinian state in September 2011, it could find out in January 2012 that an Iranian entity has been given an additional foothold in the Middle East.”
Speaking to the European Parliament in Strasbourg, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said that the “quest for a negotiated agreement has dominated the region for decades. I continue to believe that a negotiated solution is the only way forward.”
But at the same time, she said, she hoped that the unity of Fatah and Hamas was a positive development – one that was an important part of the process toward a two-state solution.
It was important to judge the unity efforts by their results, Ashton said.
Separately, she called on Israel to transfer the tax revenues to the Palestinians that it has withheld since the start of the month. Israel has refused to give the money to the PA until it receives assurances that the money won’t end up in the Hamas coffers.
Ashton also spoke out against nongovernmental groups who try to send ships to Gaza to break the Israeli blockade.
“I do not consider a flotilla to be the right response to the humanitarian situation in Gaza,” said Ashton, as she called on Israel to allow more movement of goods and people in and out of the Strip.
“I want to see the people of Gaza with a future, and I also want to see Gilad Schalit,captive for years in Gaza, given the chance to go home to his mother and father,” she said.

"Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ: (Titus 2:13).

"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words"
(I Thessalonians 4:16-18).

----------oOo---------
 
 
Executive Orders
 
Aug 5, 2011 2:47 PM
 

Executive Orders (EO)s are decrees that are issued by the President of the United States and which carry the force of law when activated by a president. All EOs are printed in the U.S. Federal Register. The following are a few examples of some EOs and their purposes that relate to a State of national emergency.10995--Federal seizure of all communications media in the United States;
  • 10997--Federal seizure of all electric power, fuels, minerals, public and private;
  • 10998--Federal seizure of all food supplies and resources, public and private and all farms and equipment;
  • 10999--Federal seizure of all means of transportation, including cars, trucks, or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports and water ways;
  • 11000--Federal seizure of American people for work forces under federal supervision, including the splitting up of families if the government so desires;
  • 11001--Federal seizure of all health, education and welfare facilities, both public and private;
  • 11002--Empowers the Postmaster General to register all men, women and children in the United States of America;
  • 11003--Federal seizure of all airports and aircraft;
  • 11004--Federal seizure of all housing and finances and authority to establish Forced Relocation. Authority to designate areas to be abandoned as "unsafe," establish new locations for the populations, relocate communities, build new housing with public funds;
  • 11005--Seizure of all railroads, inland waterways and storage facilities, both public and private;
  • 11051--Provides FEMA complete authorization to put above orders into effect in times of increased international tension of economic or financial crisis (FEMA will be in control in case of "National Emergency").
  • "President William Jefferson Clinton wrote one EO that can cover all of these. He wrote Executive Order 12919 (http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=3604 ) on June 3, 1994, which was released on June 6, 1994. This EO will be the only thing needed to be enacted in order for the U.S. president to become a fully empowered dictator. It covers all of the EOs mentioned previously. The only thing this EO doesn't do is define WHAT the "national emergency" would have to be in order for this EO to be signed. Please keep that in mind. Anything can be declared a "national emergency" to facilitate EO 12919 being enacted."
COMING WORLD DICTATOR
 
 
"And power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues and nations" (Revelation 13:7).
The Gentile beast will confirm Israel's covenant with many for seven years. This confirmation event will occur on the first day of the seven years. Negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians are likely to produce this covenant. WATCH!
 
Jesus said, "If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee" (Revelation 3:3).
 
It is quite plausible the United States has elected its last president
 
EVEN SO, COME LORD JESUS

Immediately prior to the first day of the tribulation and the covenant confirmation ceremony, something exciting is going to happen to the true believers in Christ Jesus:

"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).
----------oOo---------
 
 
 
ISRAEL AND THE UNITED STATES
 
 
Why is it that happenings in the tiny country of Israel receive so much coverage by the United States' news media? Why is it that the U.S. government is so involved in Israel's political affairs? Learned Christians know that nothing has ever happened, nor will ever happen, contrary to God's sovereign decree:
 
"For I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all of my pleasure: . . . . . yea, I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed it, I will also do it" (Isaiah 46:9-11).
 
Therefore, we must conclude that God is bringing to pass His plan and on His timetable.
Everyone who knows anything about Bible prophecy knows that it is late in the day of the Gentile Church Age and the tribulation shadows are long. Of the many shadows that signal the soon-coming Rapture of the Church and the seven years of tribulation, there is one event that is a surer sign than all the others. Yes, there is an event that signals the first day of the 7-yr. tribulation. The Bible says:
 
"And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease....." (Daniel 9:27).
 
He (a political leader) shall confirm the covenant with many for the entire seven yrs. prior to the Second Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ (Messiah). To learn more about the identity of this man who is to confirm (guarantee) Israel's covenant with many, let's go to Daniel 9:26. The Bible says:
 
"And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary......" (Daniel 9:26).
 
From the above, I call your attention to "the prince that shall come." It is "the prince that shall come" who will confirm Israel's covenant with many for seven yrs. Here God also reveals that "the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary." Notice please, it does not say that the coming prince shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. But rather, it says that "the PEOPLE of the prince that shall come" shall destroy Jerusalem and the Jewish temple. This was fulfilled in 70 A.D. by the Romans. Therefore, the antichrist is a Gentile of Roman descent. However, the Bible does not say the antichrist beast must come from the geographical area of the old Roman Empire!!!
 
Remember that the entire 70 weeks of years (490 yrs.) are decreed to Israel and the holy city of Jerusalem (Daniel 9:24). Therefore, the "covenant with many" is a covenant involving Israel and Jerusalem. The man who will confirm (not make) the covenant (treaty) is of the people who destroyed Jerusalem and the second temple in 70 A.D. (Daniel 9:26). The prince (political leader) is also called the antichrist, the beast, the little horn and the king of Babylon. The Gentile political leader who will guarantee Israel's treaty with many is of Roman ancestry.
 
It is commonly known that many, but not all, Europeans are of Roman descent. It was the English-European-Romans who first settled the East Coast of the U.S. The French-European-Romans settled Mid-America. The Southwest and California were settled by the Spanish-European-Romans. Also, some of North Africa was part of the Roman empire. Therefore, some African Americans are of Roman descent.
 
President Jefferson purchased the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803. President Polk obtained the Southwest and California as a result of the War with Mexico in 1848. Consequently, the vast majority of the Caucasian race in the U.S. are of Roman ancestry. Almost all the U.S. presidents have been Roman descendants. It is very possible that President Obama is also of Roman descent. The Bible does not say that the antichrist is from the geographical area of the old Roman empire, but rather, as we have proven from Scripture, a president of the U.S. is likely Scripturally qualified to be the beast; the antichrist!
 
Many are looking for someone who is openly anti-Israel such as Adolph Hitler and Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Bible does not teach that. In the book of Revelation, in chapter 17:3 & 7, we learn that the beast will unite with the MOTHER OF HARLOTS and her many harlot daughters, which make up the majority of organized Christendom. The antichrist professes to be pro-Christian and will guarantee (probably militarily) the soon-coming Israeli-Palestinian peace treaty.
 
Would Israel trust an openly avowed enemy to guarantee their national security? No! In the beginning the beast is cast as a peacemaker and a friend of Israel; Revelation 6:2. What superpower nation does Israel trust? What superpower country is primarily involved in Israel's peace process involving the status of Jerusalem? Please, dear reader, don't be deceived! Jesus said to the church:
 
"Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee" (Rev. 3:3).
 
In other words, if you do watch, I will not come on you as a thief, and you shall know what hour I will come upon you. WATCH for the Israeli peace treaty confirmation ceremony and KNOW when Christ Jesus is coming for His bride.
 
"And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him (Rev. 13:4)?
 
The correct answers are NOBODY! The beast is the king from the West. The kings from the North, South and East will oppose him in the last half of the tribulation in the war at Armageddon. Since World War I, the U.S. has been the superpower (king) of the West. Presently, the U.S. has the most powerful military in the history of the world and won't be conquered anytime soon.
 
"And all the world wondered after the beast," waving their red, white and blue star spangled banners all the way to hell. Again I say, Please don't be deceived! WATCH AND KNOW (Rev. 3:3)!
 
IS THE U.S. IN BIBLE PROPHECY?
 
In the book of Revelation, chapter 13, some details are given about the first beast, commonly known as the antichrist:
 
"And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over ALL kindreds, and tongues, and NATIONS" (Rev.13:7).
 
It is an indisputable Biblical fact that the U.S. will be under the authority of the first beast as he will have authority over "ALL NATIONS." Yes, the U.S. is still A NATION. This means one of two things must happen; either the U.S. will produce the beast, or will be conquered by him. At this time the U.S. has the most powerful military in the history of the world. For the first time in its history, the U.S. has no formidable military foe. I repeat the Scripture:
 
"And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him" (Rev. 13:4). NOBODY!
 
The generation that has seen the nation Israel established again in the Promised Land again on May 14, 1948 will not pass until "all these things be fulfilled" (Matthew 24:32-34). Yes, the U.S. is in Bible prophecy. Yes, the Rapture must occur immediately before the 7-yr. tribulation. Yes, the U.S. can produce the antichrist beast. Is he in the White House now? Time will tell! WATCH! President Bush introduced a "road map to Israeli peace." Obviously, U.S. presidents don't know there will be no peace in Israel until the Prince of Peace," the Lord Jesus Christ, returns to establish His kingdom on earth for 1,000 yrs.
 
 
THE PROMISED LAND
 
God made a covenant with Abram (Abraham) which promises Abraham's descendants all the land from the Nile River in Egypt to the Euphrates River.

The Bible says:
"In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates" (Genesis 15:18).
 
COMING WORLD DOMINION
 
"And power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues and nations" (Revelation 13:7).
 
The Gentile beast will confirm (guarantee) Israel's "covenant with many." This confirmation event will occur on the first day of the seven-year tribulation. This agreement is now in process. The Church Age goes up to the seven-year tribulation, but not into the tribulation. WATCH!
 
"If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee" (Revelation 3:3).
 
It is quite plausible the United States has elected its last president.
 

"And he (the beast) shall confirm
the
(Israeli) covenant with many for one week (seven yrs.)"
(Daniel 9:27).
COULD THIS BE THAT MAN??
 
EVEN SO, COME LORD JESUS
 
Immediately prior to the first day of the tribulation and the covenant confirmation ceremony, something exciting is going to happen to the true believers in Christ Jesus:
 
"For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first; then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words" (I Thessalonians 4:16-18).
 

Retired pastor/teacher
JamesMcCutchan
jmccutchan@aol.com

BACK